9 September 2014

Boris Kagarlitsky, a Kremlin's mole in the leftist movement (updated)

Deluded British leftists like to invite Russian allegedly left-wing publicist Boris Kagarlitsky of the Institute for Globalization Studies and Social Movements to take part in their events.

On 2 June this year, he joined, via Skype, the founding meeting of the "Solidarity with the Antifascist Resistance in Ukraine" that was attended by Richard Brenner, Lindsey German (Counterfire), Andrew Murray (Communist Party of Great Britain), Alan Woods (International Marxist Tendency) and Sergei Kirichuk (Borotba).

On 27 August, he spoke at the public meeting "How to stop the spread of War". Other speakers and participants included Tariq Ali, Lindsey German, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Owen Jones, Francesca Martinez, Stafford Scott, Kate Smurthwaite, and Christian Fuchs.

Boris Kagarlitsky speaking at the meeting "Solidarity with the Antifascist Resistance in Ukraine", 27 August 2014, London
In Russia, however, Kagarlitsky prefers a different company. I have already mentioned that Kagarlitsky took part in a meeting of the Russian far right "Florian Geyer" club headed by Russian right-wing Islamist Geydar Dzhemal and frequented by Russian fascists such as Aleksandr Dugin, Maksim Kalashnikov and Mikhail Leontyev, Swedish anti-Semite Israel Shamir and Italian Nazi-Maoist Claudio Mutti among others.

Kagarlitsky (and Richard Brenner) also took part in the conference "The world crisis and the conflict in Ukraine" held in annexed Yalta on 6-7 July 2014 and co-organised by his Institute for Globalization Studies and Social Movements. Other co-organisers of this conference - the ultranationalist "Novaya Rus" (New Russia) headed by Aleksey Anpilogov - held a second conference titled "Russia, Ukraine, New Russia: global problems and challenges", to which they invited international fascists such as Frank Creyelman (Vlaams Belang), Luc Michel (Parti Communautaire National-Européen), Márton Gyöngyösi (Jobbik), Roberto Fiore (Forza Nuova), Mateusz Piskorski (Samooborona) and Nick Griffin (British National Party). (Only Piskorski and Fiore, however, were able to come.)

And here is a photograph that features Kagarlitsky in a company of Russian fascists: Aleksey Belyaev-Gintovt (prominent member of Aleksandr Dugin's International Eurasian Movement), Yevgeniy Zhilin (militant extreme right Oplot group), Konstantin Krylov (far right "Russian Social Movement - Russia") and Yegor Kholmogorov.

Boris Kagarlitsky in a company of Russian fascists, September 2014, Moscow (?)
Next time, British leftists may want to invite Kagarlitsky's fascist friends to some left-wing meeting in London too.

Russian investigative journalists have established that Kagarlitsky has been cooperating with the Kremlin at least since 2005. His task has been to help control the Russian left-wing movement outside the sphere of influence of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF). In 2006, he published a report titled "Gale Warning" that aimed at exploring the levels of corruption within Russian political parties. According to Kagarlitsky, the CPRF was the most corrupt party in Russia. While I have no doubts that the CPRF is a corrupt organisation, the most interesting and revealing aspect of Kagarlitsky's report is that he completely ignored two major Russian parties: pro-Putin United Russia and Vladimir Zhirinovsky's far right, misleadingly named Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia. Kagarlitsky's report has nothing on them - a quite telling omission. (The CPRF's leader Gennadiy Zyuganov successfully sued Kagarlitsky for libel, and the latter made an apology.)

Internationally, Kagarlitsky holds himself as a critic and opponent of Putin's regime, but in fact he is a tool of this very regime, a tool that is used to tamp down the genuinely left-wing anti-Putin movement in Russia. It is, therefore, not surprising that Kagarlitsky's Institute for Globalization Studies and Social Movements became one of the organisations that have recently received grants from the Kremlin. Kagarlitsky is doing a good job throwing dust in the eyes of the international left, so Putin knows that he is worth financial support.



    On the Left or In Russia?


  2. Please note that a veritably liberal Levada-tsentr, the presently anti-Putin Committee of Soldiers' Mothers and the election watchdog Golos, many times critical of the regime, have also received presidential grants.The very fact of the receipt of a grant does not prove ideological collaboration with the authorities.

    1. Since Kagarlitsky actively disseminates Kremlin's narratives and is a KGB collaborator, there is no doubt why he was awarded a Putin's award.

    2. OK, Kremlin narratives is a lead, but what is your source for the "KGB collaborator"? Stringer-news.com does not look like a particularly reputable site. Or is it?

    3. The investigation published on the "Stringer News" website provides many insights into Kagarlitsky's collaboration with the Kremlin.
      Actually, they may be wrong about the year when they think he started collaborating with the regime. They say it's 2005; it may be 1982: http://www.novpol.ru/index.php?id=523

    4. But "the regime" of 2005 is not continuous with 1982. He's clearly keeping bad company now, but in the Gorbachev/early-Yeltsin area he was an honourable independent socialist, or so he appeared.

  3. Do you have any reason to think that what B. Kagarlitsky tells 'deluded British leftists' is false? You seem to think hold to magical thought that if someone is in the control of the Kremlin, then the people he talks to must immediately also be damaged, irrespective of what he actually says. But magical damage does not exist. -- Mark

  4. Thank you for this research. I have cited it in this letter. https://piraniarchive.wordpress.com/home/investigations-campaigns-and-other-stuff/stop-calling-warmongers-anti-war-activists/


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.