How Ukrainian History Should be Debated - a series of articles

A number of researchers replied to the smear article by Taras Kuzio, which has already been discussed here.

Special thanks goes to David R. Marples for providing an excellent platform for publishing these replies.

• Anton Shekhovtsov: Taras Kuzio’s Review of the “Russian and Ukrainian Nationalism” Workshop
• John-Paul Himka: Assessing the Prolog Legacy
• Halya Coynash: Limits of Tolerance
• Andriy Portnov: On Ukrainian Studies There and Here (Concerning the conference in New York and Taras Kuzio’s article)
• Jared McBride: On the Columbia Symposium
• Johan Dietsch: On Pluralism, Free Expression, and Intellectual Honesty
• Dominique Arel: On Context, Comparison, and Dialogue
• Tarik Cyril Amar, Per Anders Rudling, and Andreas Umland: Taras Kuzio’s Alternative Reality or How Not to Write about a Workshop (and Colleagues) –At Columbia or Anywhere Else